Demographics and discussion influence views on algorithmic fairness

The field of algorithmic fairness has highlighted ethical questions which may not have purely technical answers. For example, different algorithmic fairness constraints are often impossible to satisfy simultaneously, and choosing between them requires value judgments about which people may disagree. Here we investigate whether people's beliefs about algorithmic fairness correlate with their demographic backgrounds, a question of interest because computer science is demographically non-representative. If beliefs about algorithmic fairness correlate with demographics, and algorithm designers are demographically non-representative, decisions made about algorithmic fairness may not reflect the will of the population as a whole. We show in two separate surveys that gender correlates with beliefs about algorithmic fairness. For example, women are significantly less likely to favor including gender as a feature in an algorithm which recommends courses to students if doing so would make female students less likely to be recommended science courses.

Paper

References (13)

10On views of race and inequality, blacks and whites are worlds apart2016 · Pew Research Center. Available
11Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin2013 · Education Review,
12Comparing Google Consumer Surveys to existing probability and non-probability based internet surveys2012 · Google White Paper,

Scroll for more · 1 remaining

Similar papers

© 2026 NYSGPT2525 LLC