The literature on awareness modeling includes both syntax-free and\nsyntax-based frameworks. Heifetz, Meier \\& Schipper (HMS) propose a lattice\nmodel of awareness that is syntax-free. While their lattice approach is elegant\nand intuitive, it precludes the simple option of relying on formal language to\ninduce lattices, and does not explicitly distinguish uncertainty from\nunawareness. Contra this, the most prominent syntax-based solution, the\nFagin-Halpern (FH) model, accounts for this distinction and offers a simple\nrepresentation of awareness, but lacks the intuitiveness of the lattice\nstructure. Here, we combine these two approaches by providing a lattice of\nKripke models, induced by atom subset inclusion, in which uncertainty and\nunawareness are separate. We show our model equivalent to both HMS and FH\nmodels by defining transformations between them which preserve satisfaction of\nformulas of a language for explicit knowledge, and obtain completeness through\nour and HMS' results. Lastly, we prove that the Kripke lattice model can be\nshown equivalent to the FH model (when awareness is propositionally determined)\nalso with respect to the language of the Logic of General Awareness, for which\nthe FH model where originally proposed.\n