LLM-ESR: Large Language Models Enhancement for Long-tailed Sequential Recommendation

Sequential recommender systems (SRS) aim to predict users' subsequent choices based on their historical interactions and have found applications in diverse fields such as e-commerce and social media. However, in real-world systems, most users interact with only a handful of items, while the majority of items are seldom consumed. These two issues, known as the long-tail user and long-tail item challenges, often pose difficulties for existing SRS. These challenges can adversely affect user experience and seller benefits, making them crucial to address. Though a few works have addressed the challenges, they still struggle with the seesaw or noisy issues due to the intrinsic scarcity of interactions. The advancements in large language models (LLMs) present a promising solution to these problems from a semantic perspective. As one of the pioneers in this field, we propose the Large Language Models Enhancement framework for Sequential Recommendation (LLM-ESR). This framework utilizes semantic embeddings derived from LLMs to enhance SRS without adding extra inference load from LLMs. To address the long-tail item challenge, we design a dual-view modeling framework that combines semantics from LLMs and collaborative signals from conventional SRS. For the long-tail user challenge, we propose a retrieval augmented self-distillation method to enhance user preference representation using more informative interactions from similar users. To verify the effectiveness and versatility of our proposed enhancement framework, we conduct extensive experiments on three real-world datasets using three popular SRS models. The results show that our method surpasses existing baselines consistently, and benefits long-tail users and items especially. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/LLM-ESR.

Paper

Similar papers

Peer review

Reviewer Bjnq7/10 · confidence 4/52024-07-08

Summary

The paper presents a framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) into sequential recommendation systems (SRS) to tackle the long-tail challenges. The framework includes dual-view modeling, which combines semantic embeddings from LLMs with collaborative signals, and a retrieval-augmented self-distillation method to enhance user preference representation. The authors validate their approach through extensive experiments on three real-world datasets, demonstrating significant improvements over existing methods.

Strengths

1) The dual-view modeling and retrieval-augmented self-distillation methods are novel contributions that enhance the performance of SRS. 2) Utilizing LLMs to derive semantic embeddings for items and users adds a new dimension to the traditional collaborative filtering methods. 3) The extensive experimental evaluation, including comparisons with multiple baselines and ablation studies, strengthens the validity of the findings. 4) The paper provides comprehensive details on the methodology, including mathematical formulations and algorithmic steps, facilitating reproducibility.

Weaknesses

1) There is a risk that the semantic embeddings might overfit to the training data, especially if the textual descriptions are not diverse enough. 2) The performance of the framework might be sensitive to the choice of hyper-parameters, which is not extensively explored in the paper.

Questions

1) How do the authors mitigate the risk of overfitting with semantic embeddings, especially in scenarios with limited textual data? 2) Can the authors elaborate on the hyper-parameter tuning process and its impact on the performance?

Rating

7

Confidence

4

Soundness

3

Presentation

3

Contribution

3

Limitations

The authors have addressed several limitations, but there is room for more in-depth discussion on potential biases introduced by semantic embeddings and the sensitive to the choice of hyper-parameters.

Reviewer wsRH7/10 · confidence 4/52024-07-11

Summary

This paper introduces a novel framework designed to address the long-tail challenges in sequential recommendation systems (SRS). By leveraging semantic embeddings from large language models (LLMs) and combining them with collaborative signals, the authors propose a dual-view modeling framework and a retrieval-augmented self-distillation method. This approach aims to enhance recommendations for both long-tail users and items without adding significant inference load. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Strengths

1. The paper successfully integrates LLMs with SRS to address long-tail challenges, a novel approach that leverages the semantic understanding of LLMs while maintaining low inference costs. 2. The dual-view modeling framework effectively combines semantic and collaborative signals, providing a comprehensive enhancement for SRS. 3. This method innovatively uses interactions from similar users to enhance user preference representation, addressing the long-tail user challenge. 4. The proposed framework is model-agnostic and can be adapted to any sequential recommendation model, making it highly applicable in real-world scenarios.

Weaknesses

1. The proposed dual-view and self-distillation methods add layers of complexity to the SRS, which may pose challenges in practical implementation. 2. The framework assumes a certain level of similarity in user interactions, which might not hold true for highly diverse user bases. 3. Impact on Popular Items: While the focus is on long-tail items and users, the potential impact on recommendations for popular items is not thoroughly explored.

Questions

1. Could the authors provide more details on the practical implementation challenges and how they can be mitigated? 2. How does the framework handle highly diverse user interactions where finding similar users may be challenging? 3. Balanced Performance: What measures have been taken to ensure that the enhancement for long-tail users and items does not adversely affect recommendations for popular items?

Rating

7

Confidence

4

Soundness

4

Presentation

3

Contribution

3

Limitations

Discussing potential negative societal impacts, such as reinforcing biases in recommendations, would be beneficial.

Reviewer V8zP6/10 · confidence 4/52024-07-11

Summary

The paper addresses the challenges in sequential recommender systems (SRS), particularly the long-tail user and long-tail item issues, which complicate user experience and seller benefits in real-world applications. The authors propose the Large Language Models Enhancement framework for Sequential Recommendation (LLM-ESR) to mitigate these challenges. The LLM-ESR framework leverages semantic embeddings derived from large language models (LLMs) to enhance SRS without increasing inference load. To tackle the long-tail item problem, the framework employs a dual-view modeling approach that integrates semantics from LLMs with collaborative signals from traditional SRS. For the long-tail user issue, a retrieval augmented self-distillation method is introduced to improve user preference representation by utilizing more informative interactions from similar users.

Strengths

- The work includes extensive experiments, testing multiple aspects of the model's capabilities. - The approach is quite new. Recommender systems based on LLMs are a promising direction.

Weaknesses

- The paper does not sufficiently and deeply discuss existing work, making the motivation and core idea of the paper seem less convincing, and the innovation of the paper is also insufficient. - The baselines used in the experiments are limited.

Questions

- In line 44, the authors mention that existing studies perform poorly due to "ignorance of the true relationship between items." What is the true relationship between items, and how does it affect recommendations? - Although SASRec is a classic model, it is not reasonable to conclude that all SRSs perform poorly in long-tail scenarios solely based on SASRec. Have the authors analyzed why SASRec performs poorly in long-tail scenarios? Do models that use other techniques specifically for long-tail scenarios have this problem? What are their limitations?

Rating

6

Confidence

4

Soundness

3

Presentation

3

Contribution

2

Limitations

Yes

Reviewer V8zP2024-08-10

Thanks for the analysis and clarification, and I will raise the rating.

Reviewer Bjnq2024-08-12

The authors have answered all my concerns. To this end, I prefer to recommend this paper acceptance

Authorsrebuttal2024-08-12

We really thank you for taking the time to carefully assess our work and provide thoughtful feedback. Your suggestions greatly help improve our paper.

Authorsrebuttal2024-08-12

Dear reviewer, we sincerely appreciate your valuable time and insightful suggestions on our paper again. We hope that we address your concerns by our responses. Since the reviewer-author discussion deadline is approaching, please let us know if you have any other questions. We are glad to further respond to your concerns.

Reviewer wsRH2024-08-13

You have resolved some of my concerns, and I am inclined to raise my score. However, there are some issues that need further improvement in the final version.

Authorsrebuttal2024-08-13

We really thank you for your valuable time and suggestions! We promise to address the issues you have referred to in the revised version.

Program Chairsdecision2024-09-25

Decision

Accept (spotlight)

© 2026 NYSGPT2525 LLC