Equitable Access to Justice: Logical LLMs Show Promise

The costs and complexity of the American judicial system limit access to legal solutions for many Americans. Large language models (LLMs) hold great potential to improve access to justice. However, a major challenge in applying AI and LLMs in legal contexts, where consistency and reliability are crucial, is the need for System 2 reasoning. In this paper, we explore the integration of LLMs with logic programming to enhance their ability to reason, bringing their strategic capabilities closer to that of a skilled lawyer. Our objective is to translate laws and contracts into logic programs that can be applied to specific legal cases, with a focus on insurance contracts. We demonstrate that while GPT-4o fails to encode a simple health insurance contract into logical code, the recently released OpenAI o1-preview model succeeds, exemplifying how LLMs with advanced System 2 reasoning capabilities can expand access to justice.

Paper

References (20)

09Self-Represented Litigation Network2021
10Handling Cases Involving Self-Represented Litigants2019 · www
11If the contribution is primarily a new model architecture, the paper should describe the architecture clearly and fully
12CodeX Stanford Formation DemoSWISH – SWI-Prolog for SHaring

Scroll for more · 8 remaining

Similar papers

© 2026 NYSGPT2525 LLC