Summary
1. This paper proposed ReF-LDM for reference-based face image restoration with CacheKV to utilize the input reference images.
2. This paper introduced a timestep-scaled identity loss, which considers the characteristics of diffusion models and helps ReF-LDM better learn the discriminating features of human identities.
3. This paper constructed FFHQ-Ref, a dataset comprising 20,406 high-quality face images and their corresponding reference images, to facilitate the advance of reference-based face image restoration.
Strengths
1. This paper proposed ReF-LDM, which incorporates the CacheKV mechanism and the timestep scaled identity loss, to effectively utilize multiple reference images for face restoration.
2. This paper constructed the FFHQ-Ref dataset, which surpasses the existing dataset in both quantity and quality, to facilitate the research in reference-based face restoration.
3. Evaluation results demonstrate that ReF-LDM achieves superior performance in face identity similarity over state-of-the-art methods.
Weaknesses
1. The idea of replacing the key/value in self-attention layers with that of reference images has been widely used in style transfer work. This work follows the same scheme - extracting style features (key/value) from multiple reference images and inserting them during denoising. However, from the results, it seems that the style of reference images affects less on the generation. I wonder the reason behind it.
2. At the first stage of training, i.e., train an LDM with only LD condition, which loss function is adapted here?
3. Since reference images aim to provide ID information during restoration, why not just inject face embeddings of multiple HQ faces as a condition? What are the advantages of the proposed method over the above strategy?
4. For the ablation study of the timestep-dependent identity loss, have the authors tried to apply such a loss after T steps?
5. The proposed dataset does not contain new data, which is basically a re-labeling and cleaning work on FFHQ. Overall, the novelty is not significant.
Questions
Please refer to the weakness section and try to answer these five questions during rebuttal.
Limitations
Limitations are discussed in this paper.
When the face region is occluded by other objects, the proposed model may generate artifacts.
For certain face poses (e.g, side face), the reconstructed eyes may appear unnatural.