Weight for Robustness: A Comprehensive Approach towards Optimal Fault-Tolerant Asynchronous ML

We address the challenges of Byzantine-robust training in asynchronous distributed machine learning systems, aiming to enhance efficiency amid massive parallelization and heterogeneous computing resources. Asynchronous systems, marked by independently operating workers and intermittent updates, uniquely struggle with maintaining integrity against Byzantine failures, which encompass malicious or erroneous actions that disrupt learning. The inherent delays in such settings not only introduce additional bias to the system but also obscure the disruptions caused by Byzantine faults. To tackle these issues, we adapt the Byzantine framework to asynchronous dynamics by introducing a novel weighted robust aggregation framework. This allows for the extension of robust aggregators and a recent meta-aggregator to their weighted versions, mitigating the effects of delayed updates. By further incorporating a recent variance-reduction technique, we achieve an optimal convergence rate for the first time in an asynchronous Byzantine environment. Our methodology is rigorously validated through empirical and theoretical analysis, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing fault tolerance and optimizing performance in asynchronous ML systems.

Paper

References (39)

Scroll for more · 27 remaining

Similar papers

Peer review

Reviewer ApUX6/10 · confidence 3/52024-06-26

Summary

The paper address the challenges of Byzantine-robust training in asynchronous distributed machine learning systems, aiming to enhance efficiency amid massive parallelization and heterogeneous compute resources, by introducing a novel weighted robust aggregation framework. Quantify the difficulty in asynchronous scenarios, by considering the number of Byzantine updates, which is more natural than the standard measure of number of Byzantine workers. Identify the need to utilize weighted aggregators rather than standard ones in favour of asynchronous Byzantine problems. Towards doing so, they extend the robust aggregation framework to allow and include weights, and develop appropriate (weighted) rules and a meta-aggregator. Achieving Optimal Convergence: They incorporate weighted robust framework with a recent double momentum mechanism, leveraging its unique features to achieve an optimal convergence rate for the first time in asynchronous Byzantine ML.

Strengths

This paper proposes a new solution for Byzantine robust training in asynchronous distributed machine learning systems, with rigorous research methods and reliable experimental results. The paper has a reasonable structure, coherent logic, and clear expression. The research findings have significant implications for asynchronous distributed machine learning. They incorporate weighted robust framework with a recent double momentum mechanism, leveraging its unique features to achieve an optimal convergence rate for the first time in asynchronous Byzantine ML. They adopts a method similar to attention mechanism, assigning different weights to different parts.

Weaknesses

The experiment is not sufficient, why not compare it with the weighting methods mentioned in the article. The paper quantified the difficulty in asynchronous scenarios, by considering the number of Byzantine updates, which is more natural than the standard measure of number of Byzantine workers, but the experimental results did not prove this point.

Questions

The paper introduced a novel weighted robust aggregation framework to address the challenges of Byzantine-robust training in asynchronous distributed machine learning systems, but there is no detailed explanation on how the weight coefficients of the framework are calculated.

Rating

6

Confidence

3

Soundness

3

Presentation

2

Contribution

2

Limitations

The author did not discuss its limitations in the paper. This paper's work generally does not bring the potential negative social impacts, including privacy issues, algorithmic biases, and the risk of technology abuse.

Reviewer y4Tu6/10 · confidence 3/52024-07-12

Summary

This work introduces a weighted robust aggregation framework and extends traditional robust aggregators to asynchronous Byzantine environments. By integrating the proposed framework with a recent double momentum mechanism, the authors achieve optimal convergence rates in asynchronous Byzantine ML under the convex setting.

Strengths

- The authors address an important problem of Byzantine robustness in asynchronous distributed environments. - Novel combination of $\mu^2$-SGD with weighted robust aggregation to achieve optimal convergence rates for the first time. In contrast to existing works, the obtained convergence rate is independent of data dimensionality and matches the rates of asynchronous settings in the absence of Byzantine workers. - The paper is well written and well contextualized w.r.t to existing work in both synchronous and asynchronous Byzantine literature.

Weaknesses

- Empirical evaluations are limited, spanning only a single dataset - Currently only convex scenario is considered

Questions

While a vast variety of attacks have been designed for the synchronous case, they may not be as impactful in the asynchronous case. While the authors adapt Little and Empire to the asynchronous scenario, are there other attacks specific to asynchronous settings? Can the authors comment on the significance of evaluated attacks in the asynchronous case?

Rating

6

Confidence

3

Soundness

3

Presentation

3

Contribution

3

Limitations

Empirical assessments should be conducted on at least one more dataset to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The paper can benefit from restructuring to at least retain important experimental details in the main paper, such as details on the evaluated attacks. Currently, all experimental details have been deferred to Appendix except the name of the dataset.

Reviewer hh1u6/10 · confidence 4/52024-07-14

Summary

The paper addresses the challenges of Byzantine-robust training in asynchronous distributed machine learning systems. The authors propose a novel weighted robust aggregation framework to mitigate the effects of delayed updates and enhance fault tolerance in such environments. They incorporate a recent variance-reduction technique to achieve optimal convergence rates in asynchronous Byzantine settings. The methodology is validated through empirical and theoretical analysis, demonstrating its effectiveness in optimizing performance and fault tolerance.

Strengths

* The introduction of a weighted robust aggregation framework adapted to asynchronous settings is a significant contribution. This innovation allows for more efficient handling of Byzantine faults, which are critical in distributed systems. * The paper provides both empirical and theoretical validation of the proposed methodology. This dual approach strengthens the credibility of the results and demonstrates the practical applicability of the proposed techniques. * Achieving an optimal convergence rate in asynchronous Byzantine environments is a noteworthy accomplishment. The incorporation of a recent variance-reduction technique adds further value to the research. * The paper provides a thorough review of existing approaches to Byzantine-robust training, both in synchronous and asynchronous settings. This contextualization helps in understanding the advancements made by the current work.

Weaknesses

* __Complexity of Methodology__: While the proposed framework is innovative, it is also quite complex. The introduction of weighted aggregators and the double momentum mechanism might be challenging for practitioners to implement and integrate into existing systems. * __Limited Practical Examples__: The paper lacks of sophisticated experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework, at least to show it in practical ways. * __Dependency on Assumptions__: The effectiveness of the proposed method relies heavily on several assumptions, such as bounded delays and the fraction of Byzantine updates. These assumptions might not hold in all practical settings, potentially limiting the method's applicability.

Questions

* While your theoretical analysis is robust, have you identified any discrepancies or limitations when translating these theoretical results into practical implementations? How sensitive is the proposed methodology to the assumptions made (e.g., bounded delays, fraction of Byzantine updates)? What happens if these assumptions are violated in real-world scenarios? An additional experiment should help. * How does the proposed framework scale with an increasing number of workers? Either increase or decrease Byzantine workers. Are there any scalability issues or bottlenecks that need to be addressed?

Rating

6

Confidence

4

Soundness

3

Presentation

2

Contribution

3

Limitations

N/A

Reviewer 6iKY7/10 · confidence 2/52024-07-14

Summary

The paper introduces the Asynchronous Robust μ^2-SGD algorithm, designed to address the challenges of Byzantine-robust training in asynchronous distributed machine learning (ML) systems. The method extends the standard μ^2-SGD by incorporating a robust weighted aggregation framework that mitigates the effects of delayed updates and faulty, potentially malicious contributions from distributed workers. This novel approach claims to achieve an optimal convergence rate for the first time in an asynchronous Byzantine environment, enhancing fault tolerance and performance optimization in such systems.

Strengths

- **Innovative Approach to Fault Tolerance**: The paper successfully introduces a novel robust aggregation framework that extends existing methods to accommodate asynchronous dynamics and Byzantine faults. This framework allows for the application of robust aggregators and meta-aggregators to their weighted versions, effectively handling the challenges posed by asynchronous updates and unreliable data sources. - **Clear Presentation and Insightful Analysis**: The paper provides a clear presentation, offering good insights into the differences between synchronous and asynchronous settings, which is crucial for understanding the impact and novelty of the proposed method. The authors provide detailed proofs, and the preliminary results presented look promising, indicating potential for significant contributions to the field.

Weaknesses

While I am not an expert in this specific area of asynchronous Byzantine environments, I recognize the significant value this paper offers to the NeurIPS audience. Its innovative approaches to fault tolerance in distributed ML systems are both relevant and timely (such as in the distributed Federated learning where updates can be fuzzy or even malicious). Nevertheless, there are a few areas where further clarification could enhance the paper's impact and applicability. - **Assumptions on Byzantine Behavior**: The paper introduces an interesting perspective by suggesting that it is more natural to consider the fraction of Byzantine updates rather than the fraction of Byzantine workers in asynchronous environments. While this approach aligns well with the dynamic nature of such systems, it raises questions about whether alternative, potentially simpler solutions could be explored. For instance, could the parameter server utilize mechanisms like monitoring update frequencies to identify and mitigate the impact of Byzantine workers? Further exploration into whether these alternative approaches might offer comparable robustness with potentially reduced complexity could enrich the discussion and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the trade-offs involved. - **Impact on System Metrics**: The paper could benefit from a discussion on how the proposed method impacts other critical system metrics, such as the additional memory consumption required by the parameter server and the overall impact on training speed. Understanding these implications could help in assessing the practical viability of implementing this method in real-world systems. - **Temporal Distribution of Byzantine Updates**: A minor yet intriguing question arises regarding the assumption that Byzantine updates are uniformly distributed over time. What if these updates are not uniformly distributed but are instead concentrated within specific periods? Exploring the effects of such scenarios could provide deeper insights into the robustness of the proposed method under different types of Byzantine behaviors.

Questions

See weakness section.

Rating

7

Confidence

2

Soundness

3

Presentation

3

Contribution

3

Limitations

No potential negative societal impact.

Authorsrebuttal2024-08-12

Dear reviewer, Thanks again for your positive feedback. We appreciate your suggestion to experiment with extreme scenarios, and agree that it could further support our proposed approach and findings. We will incorporate this into the final version of the paper.

Reviewer yddM6/10 · confidence 1/52024-07-18

Summary

The authors investigate asynchronous training of convex models based on a parameter server in the Byzantine failure setting, evaluating their method on MNIST

Strengths

- Author's method achieves the optimal convergence rate, which they claim prior work in asynchronous Byzantine ML has not achieved. - Authors extend the standard measure considered in the Byzantine failure literature (number of Byzantine workers) to a setting more natural for asynchronicity by considering the number of Byzantine updates

Weaknesses

- Authors do not motivate scenarios in which asynchronous convex optimization is relevant/applied in practice.

Questions

- Which convex model did you implement and are you evaluating in Section 5 and Appendix D?

Rating

6

Confidence

1

Soundness

3

Presentation

3

Contribution

3

Limitations

- The proposed method and associated guarantees do not apply to non-convex models

Reviewer hh1u2024-08-09

I appreciate the additional information and experiments they have conducted in response to my comments. The authors have addressed my concerns regarding the complexity of the methodology, practical examples, dependency on assumptions, further empirical evaluation, and scalability. Regarding the dependency on assumptions, I am now more convinced that their methods can be effective without precise knowledge of the fraction of Byzantine iterations. The comparison with standard assumptions in the literature is also a valid point. Given the authors' efforts to address my concerns and the additional evidence provided, I maintain my original score as the paper still exhibits novelty in its approach. However, I recommend that the authors incorporate the discussed points and the new experiments into the final version of the manuscript to enhance its clarity and robustness.

Reviewer y4Tu2024-08-10

The reviewer thanks the authors for their clarifying responses and additional experiments. After considering the responses as well as the reviews from other reviewers, I believe my original assessment accurately reflects the contributions of the paper, hence, I will maintain my score.

Reviewer 6iKY2024-08-12

Thanks for the response. It addressed most of my concerns. Regarding to the discussion of Byzantine updates, I found that the experiments right now still used a typical setup of M Byzantine workers among N total workers where M < N/2. Since the paper has emphasized the significance of Byzantine updates, it would be helpful to experiment with extreme cases where all workers are Byzantine but fewer than half of their total updates are Byzantine. I have no other issues with the paper other than that and would like to keep my score.

Program Chairsdecision2024-09-25

Decision

Accept (poster)

© 2026 NYSGPT2525 LLC