Requires each law enforcement agency to maintain a policy ensuring that AI-generated official reports include identification of AI programs used and a statement indicating AI involvement. Mandates these reports contain an officer's signature verifying the report's accuracy. Necessitates retention of the first AI-created draft for the same duration as the official report, and states it doesn’t constitute an officer's statement. Commands agencies to maintain an audit trail identifying users of AI and any associated footage used. Prohibits contracted vendors from sharing or using AI-processed data beyond agency purposes or court orders, with allowances for system refinement. Defines "artificial intelligence" and related terms in the context of police report generation, explicitly including generative AI used with camera and audio inputs.
Paper
Full text
California SB 524 (AI Use by Law Enforcement)
ETO AGORA · U.S. state and local documents · 2025
Summary
Requires each law enforcement agency to maintain a policy ensuring that AI-generated official reports include identification of AI programs used and a statement indicating AI involvement.
Mandates these reports contain an officer's signature verifying the report's accuracy.
Necessitates retention of the first AI-created draft for the same duration as the official report, and states it doesn’t constitute an officer's statement.
Commands agencies to maintain an audit trail identifying users of AI and any associated footage used.
Prohibits contracted vendors from sharing or using AI-processed data beyond agency purposes or court orders, with allowances for system refinement.
Defines "artificial intelligence" and related terms in the context of police report generation, explicitly including generative AI used with camera and audio inputs.
Requires law enforcement agencies to identify AI-used reports and verify their content's accuracy in reports.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 13663 is added to the Penal Code, to read: 13663. (a) Each law enforcement agency shall maintain a policy to require an official report prepared by a law enforcement officer or any member of a law enforcement agency that is generated using artificial intelligence either fully or partially to contain both of the following: (1) On each page of the official report, or within the body of the text, identify every specific artificial intelligence program used in a manner that makes such identification readily apparent to the reader and prominently state the following: “This report was written either fully or in part using artificial intelligence.” (2) The signature of the law enforcement officer or member of a law enforcement agency who prepared the official report, either in physical or electronic form, verifying that they reviewed the contents of that report and that the facts contained in the official report are true and correct.
Requires law enforcement agencies to retain AI-generated report drafts and maintain an audit trail of AI use.
(b) (1) If a law enforcement officer or any member of a law enforcement agency uses artificial intelligence to create an official report, whether fully or partially, the first draft created shall be retained by the agency for as long as the official report is retained. (2) Except for the official report, a draft of any report created with the use of artificial intelligence shall not constitute an officer’s statement.
(c) The agency utilizing artificial intelligence to generate a first draft or official report shall maintain an audit trail for as long as the official report is retained that, at a minimum, identifies both of the following: (1) The person who used artificial intelligence to create a report. (2) The video and audio footage used to create a report, if any.
(d) (1) A contracted vendor shall not share, sell, or otherwise use information provided by a law enforcement agency to be processed by artificial intelligence except for either of the following purposes: (A) The contracted law enforcement agency’s purposes. (B) Pursuant to a court order. (2) A contracted vendor may access data processed by artificial intelligence for the purposes of troubleshooting, bias mitigation, accuracy improvement, or system refinement.
Defines "artificial intelligence," detailing its use in drafting and enhancing police reports via generative AI.
(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: (1) “Artificial intelligence” means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments. “Artificial intelligence” as used in this section applies to artificial intelligence systems that automatically draft police report narratives based upon an analysis of in-car or dash-mounted cameras, or body-worn camera audio or video, and artificial intelligence systems that analyze a law enforcement officer’s dictated report to generate a police report narrative automatically enhanced by generative artificial intelligence. (2) “Contracted vendor” means a third party which has made artificial intelligence available to law enforcement for the purpose of generating a draft police report. (3) “First draft” means the initial document or narrative produced solely by artificial intelligence. (4) “Law enforcement agency” means any department or agency of the state or any local government, special district, or other political subdivision thereof, that employs any peace officer, as described in Section 830. (5) “Official report” means the final version of the report that is signed by the officer under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.