Library

Graphical assessment of normality (histograms).

(A) represents the difference in accuracy between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Gemini 2.0 Flash. (B) represents the difference in accuracy between ChatGPT o1-mini and 4o. (C) represents the difference in accuracy between Gemini 2.0 Flash and ChatGPT o1-mini. (D) represents the difference in accuracy between Gemini 2.0 Flash and ChatGPT 4o. (DOCX)

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiology practices and educationData Analysis with R
Source

Paper

The full text of this publication is not hosted on 44B due to licensing.

Read it at OpenAlex

Similar papers

Shapiro-Wilk test results.Johanna Charlotte Neubauer (22278755), Anna Kaiser (16927192), Leon Lettermann (22026951) et al.2025 · Figshare In Library
Wilcoxon signed-rank test results.Johanna Charlotte Neubauer (22278755), Anna Kaiser (16927192), Leon Lettermann (22026951) et al.2025 · Figshare In Library
Is Google Gemini better than ChatGPT at evaluating research quality?Mike Thelwall2025 · Journal of Data and Information Science · 28 citations In Library
Assessment of the Performance of ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Google Gemini 2.0 Flash on Image-Based Ocular Oncology and Pathology Questions: A Cross-Sectional ResearchSüleyman Demi̇r, İsmail Cem Türkeş2025 · Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Ophthalmology In Library
ChatGPT vs Gemini: Comparative Accuracy and Efficiency in CAD-RADS Score Assignment from Radiology ReportsMatthew Silbergleit, Adrienn Tóth, Jordan Chamberlin et al.2024 · Journal of Digital Imaging · 19 citations In Library
Seeing Nothing, Saying Something: The Lack of Visual Grounding and Confabulation in Gemini Models for HistopathologyMd. Mehedi Hasan, Mehmet Engin Tozal, Murat Seçkin Ayhan2026 · medRxiv In Library
Comparison of Gemini Advanced and ChatGPT 4.0’s Performances on the Ophthalmology Resident Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) Examination Review Question BanksGurnoor S Gill, Joby Tsai, Jillene Moxam et al.2024 · Cureus · 29 citations In Library
Reliability and Quality of AI-Generated Information on Newborn Screening Tests: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and GeminiEce Nilüfer, Meserret Aslan, Şehma Şen2026 · Informatics In Library
Comparative evaluation of radiological anatomy knowledge and accuracy of <scp>ChatGPT</scp> ‐5, Gemini 2.5, and Grok 4 across normal and thinking modesİsmail Sivri, Furkan Mehmet Özden, Halit Çeli̇k et al.2026 · Anatomical Sciences Education In Library
COMPARISON BETWEEN CHAT GEMINI AND CHATGPT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGESHenderson Matsuura Sanches2024 · Journal of Engineering Research In Library
© 2026 NYSGPT2525 LLC