Loneliness is increasingly recognised as a public health concern with documented psychological andphysiological costs. Generative AI systems now offer “AI companions” capable of sustained, responsiveconversation. This article explores emerging evidence on their psychological effects. Short-termreductions in loneliness have been observed following chatbot interactions, with perceived responsiveness(“feeling heard”) implicated as a key mechanism. However, outcomes are not uniform: multi-methodand longitudinal data indicate that high-intensity, companionship-oriented use - particularly in thecontext of limited offline support - is associated with higher loneliness, reduced time spent with people,and greater emotional dependence. Integrating findings from psychology and social neuroscience, thearticle traces (i) how AI companions may confer benefit through perceived social support, emotionregulation, and felt understanding; (ii) how they may cause harm via over reliance, avoidance andsafety behaviours, and parasocial attachment; and (iii) the moderators - individual differences, usageintensity, modality, and social context - that tilt outcomes either way. AI companions are treated aspotential adjuncts to human ties rather than substitutes.
Paper
The full text of this publication is not hosted on 44B due to licensing.
Read it at OpenAlex