Fractal Theory and MF: A Veto-Based Model of Human Sovereignty in Recursive Systems

Are we really facing the end of the era of doctors? In recent days, technological voices have grown louder claiming that studying medicine has become pointless, with predictions that artificial intelligence robots will surpass even the most skilled surgeons within just a few years. This has triggered a wave of existential fear among students and professionals alike: Will machines strip us of our sovereignty over our bodies and our decisions? Amid this noise and rising anxiety, our joint research (by myself and researcher Mark D. Morgan), entitled: Fractal Theory and MF Model: A Veto-Based Model for Human Sovereignty comes to address this challenge with a scientific and structural logic: • Efficiency does not mean sovereignty: Even if robots become faster and more precise in surgery (the behavioral channel B(t)), meaning and ethical responsibility remain exclusively human. • The Right of Veto: Our MF model enforces the existence of a permanent human exit. A machine cannot act unilaterally; the physician’s voice is not merely data, but a sovereign testimony that holds the power to stop the system (Veto Power). • The future of medicine: We are not calling for abandoning technology, but for engineering AI systems that are subordinate to humans rather than replacing them. Medicine will not end; it will evolve so that the physician becomes the ethical guardian, sovereign above the machine’s precision. We believe that technological progress must advance hand in hand with the protection of human will. Our research is the ethical charter the world needs today to ensure that the human remains the master and the machine remains the tool. Translate: the full research link for the two researchers Mark D. Morgan Fatiha Nesrine Bouzid. https://www.academia.edu/145903022/Fractal_Theory_and_MF_A_Veto_Based_Model_of_Human_Sovereignty_in_Recursive_Systems_Authors