In this paper we report our works for SemEval-2014 Sentiment Analysis in Twitter evaluation challenge. This is the first time we attempt for this task, and our submissions are based on supervised machine learning algorithm. We use Support Vector Machine for both the tasks, viz. contextual polarity disambiguation and message polarity classification. We identify and implement a small set of features for each the tasks, and did not make use of any external resources and/or tools. The systems are tuned on the development sets and finally blind evaluation is performed on the respective test set, which consists of the datasets of five different domains. Our submission for the first task shows the F-score values of 76.3%, 77.04%, 70.91%, 72.25% and 66.32% for LiveJournal2014, SMS2013, Twitter2013, Twitter2014 and Twitter2014Sarcasm datasets, respectively. The system developed for the second task yields the F-score values of 54.68%, 40.56%, 50.32%, 48.22% and 36.73%, respectively for the five different test datasets.
Paper
Full text
IITPatna: Supervised Approach for Sentiment Analysis in Twitter
Semantic Scholar · Computer Science · 2014
Abstract
In this paper we report our works for SemEval-2014 Sentiment Analysis in Twitter evaluation challenge. This is the first time we attempt for this task, and our submissions are based on supervised machine learning algorithm. We use Support Vector Machine for both the tasks, viz. contextual polarity disambiguation and message polarity classification. We identify and implement a small set of features for each the tasks, and did not make use of any external resources and/or tools. The systems are tuned on the development sets and finally blind evaluation is performed on the respective test set, which consists of the datasets of five different domains. Our submission for the first task shows the F-score values of 76.3%, 77.04%, 70.91%, 72.25% and 66.32% for LiveJournal2014, SMS2013, Twitter2013, Twitter2014 and Twitter2014Sarcasm datasets, respectively. The system developed for the second task yields the F-score values of 54.68%, 40.56%, 50.32%, 48.22% and 36.73%, respectively for the five different test datasets.
References (14)
Scroll for more · 2 remaining