Type
Government
Country
Türkiye
TR
Documents
72
through any edge
Papers
72
authorship edges
Awards made
—
Named as funder
—
Identifiers
Papers
Documents in the 44B Library with Ministry of Health on the authorship, newest first.
2026-07-14 · 9 authors here
Artificial intelligence meets pediatric orthopedics: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, and Claude 3.5 in detecting supracondylar humeral fractures
2026-06-16 · 5 authors here
Large Language Model Superiority in Guideline-Based Neurointerventional Multiple-Choice Questions: Performance Analysis of Radiologists vs. LLMs Across Experience Levels
2026-05-23 · 4 authors here
ABR-UNet3D: Aspect-Aware Boundary-Resilient Attention for Robust Cardiac MRI Segmentation
2026-04-29 · 10 authors here
Differential performance of large language models in advanced cardiac life support assessment: A comprehensive multi-dimensional analysis of accuracy, consistency, and visual recognition capabilities
2026-04-10 · 28 authors here
Integrating generative artificial intelligence in African higher education: university students’ awareness, attitudes, and use of ChatGPT in Zambia
2026-04-10 · 2 authors here
An early evaluation of MedSigLIP in thyroid cytology: a comparative frozen-encoder benchmark against ImageNet-pretrained encoders
2026-04-10 · 3 authors here
Evaluation of the acceptance of artificial intelligence technologies in health with technology acceptance model
2026-04-02 · 7 authors here
Natural Language Processing-Based Triage of Superficial Soft Tissue Ultrasound Reports in Orthopedic Practice
2026-02-24 · 9 authors here
Evaluation of AI Chatbot Responses to a Standardized Patient Query on Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody–Associated Disease: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis
2026-02-19 · 5 authors here
Adapting <scp>2D</scp> Vision Transformer Backbones for <scp>3D</scp> Thoracic Multi‐Organ Segmentation
2026-02-03 · 5 authors here
Multimodal Large Language Model for Fracture Detection in Emergency Orthopedic Trauma: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
2026-02-02 · 11 authors here
Implementation of AI systems in the clinical laboratory: insights from an expert survey and recommendations for best practice
2026-01-31 · 4 authors here
Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated information in the field of general audiology
2026-01-31 · 4 authors here
Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated information in the field of general audiology
2026-01-15 · 4 authors here
How smart are the machines? An analysis of AI responses on chronic otitis media
2026-01-01 · 4 authors here
Exploring the Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Adoption on Academic Productivity and Pedagogical Innovation: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
2026-01-01 · 8 authors here
Navigating Accuracy and Clarity in Patient Education:The Role of AI Chatbots in Communicating TesticularProsthesis Information
2026-01-01 · 3 authors here
How well do frozen foundation models transfer? A calibration-focused benchmark for diabetic retinopathy grading
2025-12-18 · 2 authors here
Evaluation of physicians’ opinions on receiving health information from ChatGPT; trustworthiness, value, and danger
2025-12-03 · 5 authors here
Evaluating AI chatbots in enuresis nocturna information: A comparative analysis of readability, reliability and quality
2025-12-01 · 5 authors here
ChatGPT and Gemini in warfarin counseling
2025-10-30 · 5 authors here
Evaluation of ChatGPT-5 responses in obstetric and gynecological emergencies: concordance, readability, and clinical reliability
2025-10-14 · 9 authors here
AI performance in emergency medicine fellowship examination: comparative analysis of Chatgpt-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5, and Deepseek R1 models
2025-10-03 · 4 authors here
Artificial intelligence versus physical medicine and rehabilitation residents: Can <scp>ChatGPT</scp> compete in clinical exam performance?
2025-09-09 · 6 authors here
Comparative performance of neurosurgery-specific, peer-reviewed versus general AI chatbots in bilingual board examinations: evaluating accuracy, consistency, and error minimization strategies
Funding
Read from the funding tables, never from the document count — that count includes authorship, so it ranks institutions, not funders.
Who funds this work
Funders named on the papers above. The record holds no recipient field, so this is reached through the documents themselves — and the two columns are two different claims, kept apart.
Under a named grant
funding_awards — the award carries a grant number
Listed as funder
doc_funder_links — named, with no grant number