Type
Healthcare
Country
—
Documents
64
through any edge
Papers
64
authorship edges
Awards made
—
Named as funder
—
Identifiers
Papers
Documents in the 44B Library with Ottawa Hospital Research Institute on the authorship, newest first.
2026-04-16 · 1 authors here
A structured framework for effective and responsible generative artificial intelligence chatbot prompt engineering throughout the scientific process: a comprehensive guide for the health and medical researcher
2026-04-14 · 25 authors here
Transfer Learning and Machine Learning for Training Five-Year Survival Prognostic Models in Early Breast Cancer: Development and Validation Study
2026-03-30 · 9 authors here
MetaCAM as an ensemble-based class activation mapping framework improves model explainability
2026-03-14 · 11 authors here
Attitudes of medical and life sciences university students and postdoctoral fellows toward AI chatbots in education: an international cross-sectional survey
2026-03-01 · 9 authors here
Chest Tube Learning Synthesis and Evaluation Assistant (CheLSEA): A Prospective Observational Trial of an Intelligent Decision Support System
2026-01-02 · 2 authors here
Care-Aware Decision Layer: Embedding Ethics of Care into AI-Supported Clinical Discharge Decisions
2025-11-28 · 9 authors here
Augmenting small tabular health data for training prognostic ensemble machine learning models using generative models
2025-10-14 · 12 authors here
Survival prediction in metastatic breast cancer using artificial intelligence: a scoping review
2025-10-09 · 12 authors here
Attitudes and perceptions towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in medical journal peer review: A protocol for a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey
2025-10-08 · 15 authors here
Representation and Bias in Artificial Intelligence Models for Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review
2025-09-29 · 9 authors here
Large language models and their current use in perioperative medicine: a scoping review protocol
2025-07-31 · 47 authors here
Reporting guideline for Chatbot Health Advice studies: the CHART statement
2025-06-26 · 11 authors here
Attitudes and Perceptions of University Students and Postdoctoral Fellows in the Medical and Life Sciences Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Educational Process: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey
2025-06-13 · 36 authors here
Automation of Systematic Reviews with Large Language Models
2025-06-01 · 8 authors here
Large language models in perioperative medicine—applications and future prospects: a narrative review
2025-05-27 · 17 authors here
Attitudes and Perceptions of Biomedical Journal Editors-in-Chief Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scholarly Publishing Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey
2025-05-12 · 17 authors here
What Do Editors-in-Chief of Medical Journals Think About the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scholarly Publishing Process? Results From An International Cross-Sectional Survey Across Multiple Publishers
2025-03-28 · 4 authors here
The AI Reviewer: Evaluating AI’s Role in Citation Screening for Streamlined Systematic Reviews
2025-03-13 · 8 authors here
Comparison of <scp>ChatGPT</scp> ‐4, Copilot, Bard and Gemini Ultra on an Otolaryngology Question Bank
2025-03-01 · 5 authors here
GPT for RCTs? Using AI to determine adherence to clinical trial reporting guidelines
2025-01-01 · 20 authors here
Tracking the Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Implementation Science: Protocol for a Living Scoping Review of Applications, Evaluation Approaches and Outcomes
2024-12-18 · 7 authors here
Use of Implementation Science Concepts in the Study of Misinformation: A Scoping Review
2024-11-29 · 8 authors here
Privacy‐preserving federated data access and federated learning: Improved data sharing and <scp>AI</scp> model development in transfusion medicine
2024-10-03 · 2 authors here
Inconsistency detection in cancer data classification using explainable-AI
2024-06-18 · 9 authors here
CAManim: Animating end-to-end network activation maps
Funding
Read from the funding tables, never from the document count — that count includes authorship, so it ranks institutions, not funders.
Who funds this work
Funders named on the papers above. The record holds no recipient field, so this is reached through the documents themselves — and the two columns are two different claims, kept apart.
Under a named grant
funding_awards — the award carries a grant number
Listed as funder
doc_funder_links — named, with no grant number