Type
Education
Country
Antigua & Barbuda
AG
Documents
108
through any edge
Papers
108
authorship edges
Awards made
—
Named as funder
—
Identifiers
Papers
Documents in the 44B Library with University of Health Sciences Antigua on the authorship, newest first.
2026-07-21 · 7 authors here
Artificial intelligence for improving cardiovascular surgery training: A multiyear national exam analysis
2026-07-20 · 2 authors here
Patient Facing AI Chatbots in Digital Orthodontic Education: A Comparative Evaluation of Understandability, Actionability, Quality, and Safety of Dietary Advice
2026-07-17 · 3 authors here
Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models for Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation: Readabilty, Usability and Consistency
2026-07-14 · 9 authors here
Artificial intelligence meets pediatric orthopedics: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, and Claude 3.5 in detecting supracondylar humeral fractures
2026-07-11 · 2 authors here
Comparative quality and readability of explanatory responses generated by ChatGPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot for undergraduate medical biochemistry questions
2026-07-09 · 6 authors here
Artificial intelligence literacy, rather than artificial intelligence anxiety, is associated with career optimism in physiotherapy and rehabilitation students: a cross-sectional study
2026-07-01 · 4 authors here
Assessing the efficacy of LLMs in neuroscience: A performance analysis of ChatGPT and gemini on synaptic plasticity
2026-06-28 · 4 authors here
The performance of ChatGPT and Google Bard in medical oncology board examination
2026-06-27 · 3 authors here
Prompt sensitivity of large language models in orthodontic patient counseling: a scenario-based experimental study
2026-06-22 · 2 authors here
Quality of AI chatbot-generated information on hypersensitivity pneumonitis for clinical and patient use.
2026-06-19 · 4 authors here
A reproducible statistical evaluation framework for large-sample assessment of AI-generated medical references: cross-platform application of the reference hallucination score
2026-06-16 · 2 authors here
Comparative Accuracy and Safety of 4 Large Language Models on Cornea and External Disease Multiple-Choice Questions
2026-06-16 · 5 authors here
Optimistic and ambivalent attitudes toward clinical artificial intelligence
2026-06-11 · 5 authors here
Benchmarking GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok 4, and other LLMs on pediatric dentistry questions from a dental specialization exam
2026-06-09 · 2 authors here
Comparative Performance of GPT-5 and Gemini Models in Decision Support for Bariatric Surgery: A Simulation-Based Study
2026-06-08 · 3 authors here
Loneliness and AI chatbot dependence in young adults: the mediating role of perceived social support
2026-06-03 · 6 authors here
Assessing pediatricians’ readiness for artificial intelligence: a cross-sectional study in Istanbul, Türkiye
2026-05-22 · 12 authors here
Consensus-Level and Cluster-Adjusted Evaluation of a Large Language Model for Diagnostic Extraction from Musculoskeletal Radiology Reports
2026-05-20 · 3 authors here
Changes in artificial intelligence literacy, attitudes, and acceptance following ChatGPT-based training among midwifery students
2026-05-18 · 3 authors here
An Assessment of ChatGPT Responses to Common Postoperative Rhinoplasty Questions
2026-05-13 · 5 authors here
Evaluation of ChatGPT as a Source of Patient-Oriented Information on Gingival Recession
2026-05-11 · 10 authors here
LuminaConsent: AI-driven standardization and quality enhancement of urological informed consent documentation
2026-05-08 · 15 authors here
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence versus 263 pediatric clinicians for childhood exanthems
2026-04-29 · 10 authors here
Differential performance of large language models in advanced cardiac life support assessment: A comprehensive multi-dimensional analysis of accuracy, consistency, and visual recognition capabilities
2026-04-27 · 2 authors here
Relationship between nursing students' critical thinking dispositions and their attitudes towards artificial intelligence
Funding
Read from the funding tables, never from the document count — that count includes authorship, so it ranks institutions, not funders.
Who funds this work
Funders named on the papers above. The record holds no recipient field, so this is reached through the documents themselves — and the two columns are two different claims, kept apart.
Under a named grant
funding_awards — the award carries a grant number
Listed as funder
doc_funder_links — named, with no grant number