We aim to construct tests for evaluating whether policies for adaptive quantum-enhanced metrology are robust against unknown phase noise and are tractable to construct and to execute. Specifically, one of our tests determines scaling of phase-estimate precision with respect to photon number; the other two tests concern resource complexity with respect to the training time required to construct the policy and the execution time for the policy so constructed. The robustness test is performed on quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation by simulating the scheme under four phase-noise models corresponding to normal-distribution noise, random-telegraph noise, skew-normal-distribution noise, and log-normal-distribution noise. Control policies are devised either by an evolutionary algorithm under the same noisy conditions, albeit ignorant of its properties, or a Bayesian-based feedback method that assumes no noise. We have introduced an approach to evaluating quantum-control policies for metrology that relies on testing against unusual phase-noise models and accepting that the policies are robust only if scaling of phase-estimate precision beats the standard quantum limit and policy-design resource complexity, in the presence of phase noise, is polynomial in the number of photons.