Interpretable machine learning of halo gas density profiles: a sensitivity analysis of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations

Stellar and AGN-driven feedback processes affect the distribution of gas on a wide range of scales, from within galaxies well into the intergalactic medium. Yet, it remains unclear how feedback, through its connection to key galaxy properties, shapes the radial gas density profile in the host halo. We tackle this question using suites of the EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, and Simba cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, which span a variety of feedback models. We develop a random forest algorithm that predicts the radial gas density profile within haloes from the total halo mass and five global properties of the central galaxy: gas and stellar mass; star formation rate; mass and accretion rate of the central black hole (BH). The algorithm reproduces the simulated gas density profiles with an average accuracy of ~83-90% over the halo mass range and redshift interval 0 < z < 4 . For the first time, we apply Sobol statistical sensitivity analysis to full cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, quantifying how each feature affects the gas density as a function of distance from the halo centre. Across all simulations and redshifts, the total halo mass and the gas mass of the central galaxy are the most strongly tied to the halo gas distribution, while stellar and BH properties are generally less informative. The exact relative importance of the different features depends on the feedback scenario and redshift. Our framework can be readily embedded in semi-analytic models of galaxy formation to incorporate halo gas density profiles consistent with different hydrodynamical simulations. Our work also provides a proof of concept for constraining feedback models with future observations of galaxy properties and of the surrounding gas distribution.

Paper

References (11)

03arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2111.14566 Oleśkiewicz P., Baugh C. M., 20202021 · MNRAS
04, 2023, MNRAS, 525, 898 Mathews W. G.,2017 · ApJ
05MNRAS, 452, 2553 Kauffmann G2015 · MNRAS
06ApJ, 760, 112 Graur O2012 · ApJ
07in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, SPIE Vol. 7735, SPIE, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III. p. 773508 ( arXiv:2211.16795 ), doi:10.1117/12.856027 Bondi H., 19522010 · MNRAS
08MNRAS, 319, 168 Crain R. A., van de Voort F., 20232000 · ARA&A
09The impact of the SFR of the central galaxy is sub-dominant with respect to the other properties considered.all simulations and redshifts analysed
10, 2025, A&A, 697, A63 Pakmor R., et al., 2023MNRAS
11The stellar mass of the central galaxy appears to be more important at higher redshifts, whereas the impact

Similar papers

© 2026 NYSGPT2525 LLC