The accelerating integration of artificial intelligence into legal decision-making is reshaping how justice is administered, interpreted, and legitimized across judicial and regulatory systems. While AI-driven tools offer substantial gains in efficiency, consistency, and analytical capacity, their deployment in high-stakes legal contexts simultaneously raises critical concerns regarding transparency, accountability, fairness, and due process. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of AI integration in legal decision-making by examining its conceptual foundations, technical architectures, and regulatory implications. Drawing on comparative legal frameworks, empirical case studies, and recent developments in explainable artificial intelligence, the paper explores how algorithmic systems interact with traditional legal reasoning and institutional safeguards. Particular attention is given to challenges such as algorithmic bias, the black-box problem, attribution of legal responsibility, and the tension between transparency requirements and privacy or intellectual property protections. The analysis demonstrates that sustainable and legitimate AI-assisted legal decision-making requires hybrid governance models that combine algorithmic support with robust human oversight, standardized auditing mechanisms, and adaptive regulatory frameworks. By synthesizing legal theory, technological innovation, and policy-oriented perspectives, this work contributes to ongoing debates on how artificial intelligence can be responsibly integrated into legal systems without undermining fundamental rights or the rule of law.
Paper
The full text of this publication is not hosted on 44B due to licensing.
Read it at OpenAlex