This chapter analyzes the fragmentation of the global order of artificial intelligence (AI) governance, arguing that contemporary AI governance has become a field of normative and geopolitical contestation rather than a framework for coordinated risk management. It approaches this process as a layered phenomenon, spanning institutional and legal arrangements, diplomatic and geopolitical arenas, and the competing narratives through which technological development is justified and contested. The chapter contrasts the market-oriented American approach and the rights-based regulatory model of the European Union with China&s;s conception of AI governance, which emphasizes order, harmony, and development through state coordination. It examines international summits and organizations as sites of normative rivalry, highlighting China&s;s strategic turn toward universal forums – particularly the United Nations – as alternatives to Western regulatory clubs. Particular attention is given to Chinese narratives of AI governance and initiatives that frame AI as a tool for an inclusive and multipolar technological order. By examining diversity within BRICS+ and the Global South, the chapter shows that global AI governance is increasingly polycentric and negotiated rather than bipolar. It concludes that AI has become a central axis of contemporary geopolitics, defined less by technological superiority than by the authority to shape the rules of the future.
Paper
The full text of this publication is not hosted on 44B due to licensing.
Read it at OpenAlex