Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Responses to Public Health Questions

This cross-sectional study analyzes the quality of ChatGPT responses to public health questions.

Computer Science Medicine

View graph Source

Paper

Full text

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Responses to Public Health Questions

Semantic Scholar · Computer Science · 2023

Abstract

This cross-sectional study analyzes the quality of ChatGPT responses to public health questions.

Source of record · Semantic Scholar

Similar papers

Qualitatively Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Sexually Transmitted DiseasesElijah Moothedan, Vama Jhumkhawala, Sara Burgoa et al.2024 · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · 0 citations In Library

Artificial Intelligence and Public Health: Evaluating ChatGPT Responses to Vaccination Myths and MisconceptionsGiovanna Deiana, Marco Dettori, Antonella Arghittu et al.2023 · Vaccines · 118 citations In Library

Evaluating the Accuracy and Clinical Relevance of ChatGPT in Answering Patient Queries Related to Common Health ConditionsKamlesh Agrawal2025 · European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine In Library

“Can ChatGPT Answer Patient’s Questions?”: A Preliminary AnalysisDonghua Tao, Karl M. Kochendorfer, Tina Griffin et al.2025 · Studies in health technology and informatics · 3 citations In Library

Evaluating the Precision and Dependability of Medical Answers Generated by ChatGPTZaheera Zainal Abidin2024 · Journal of Science Technology Education Art and Medicine In Library

Evaluation of AI-Generated Responses to Pediatric Vaccination Information Requests: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis (Preprint)Tejas Raxwal, SK Patel, Kousalya Sara et al.2025 In Library

Exploring the Value and Risks of Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT in Infectious Disease Management and Public Health: Regulatory Perspectives and Qualitative InsightsAmmar Abdulrahman Jairoun, Sabaa Saleh Al‐Hemyari, Moyad Shahwan et al.2024 In Library

Assessing ChatGPT’s Potential in HIV Prevention Communication: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Accuracy, Completeness, and InclusivityAndrea De Vito, Agnese Colpani, Giulia Moi et al.2024 · AIDS and Behavior · 26 citations In Library

How Efficient Is ChatGPT in Accessing Accurate and Quality Health-Related Information?I. Ulusoy, Mehmet Yılmaz, A. Kıvrak2023 · Cureus · 27 citations In Library

Evaluating ChatGPT’s responses to vaccine-related questions: the impact of question framing on content and qualityYoshiki Kusama, Satoshi Kutsuna2025 · Translational Pediatrics · 1 citation In Library

Source of record

Semantic Scholar

44B

Welcome.

This panel sticks with you. Pick anything below and it opens right beside it, so you can dig through 60,000-plus records without ever losing your spot here.

Travel 44B

LibraryPapers, policy, standards, statute LabsEvery organization building AI ModelsIntelligence, price, and speed BenchmarksThe evaluation catalog IncidentsAI failures and harms SearchOne field across everything DashboardThe state of AI accountability in NY 44B RegistryThe Art. 44-B compliance portal