Netizens, Academicians, and Information Professionals' Opinions About AI With Special Reference To ChatGPT

This study aims to understand the perceptions and opinions of academicians towards ChatGPT-3 by collecting and analyzing social media comments, and a survey was conducted with library and information science professionals. The research uses a content analysis method and finds that while ChatGPT-3 can be a valuable tool for research and writing, it is not 100% accurate and should be cross-checked. The study also finds that while some academicians may not accept ChatGPT-3, most are starting to accept it. The study is beneficial for academicians, content developers, and librarians.

Paper

References (15)

06The second version of GPT, GPT-2, was released2019
07The Guardian . “ A Robot Wrote This Entire Article . Are You Scared yet , Human ? , ” September 8 , 2020 , sec . Opinion2015
09About OpenAI
10Opinions were divided on whether ChatGPT is against academic integrity, with 33.8% of respondents believing it is and 66
11The majority of respondents (95.8%) are aware of what ChatGPT is
12GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3), also known as ChatGPT: The latest and the most advanced version of the GPT series

Scroll for more · 3 remaining

Similar papers

© 2026 NYSGPT2525 LLC